Christine Bowser
Instructor: Kirsten Daykin
Written Communications
Argumentation Draft
12/10/13
Christine
Bowser
Instructor:
Kirsten Daykin
Written
Communications
Argumentation Draft
12/10/13
The
Importance Of Living, Learning, And Working
How would
you feel if every day of your life you had to fight for the right to
participate
in
society? How
would you feel if someone decided what you ate, what you wore for clothes,
and
what kind of programs that you could or could not participate in? Most people take for
granted
the everyday luxuries, like being able to work, having a social life, being
able to buy
what
you want, eat what you want, being able to go where you want, and even to have
the choice
to
stay at Home if you are ill. It is imperative for a
person with disabilities to have a voice. Ask
yourself
who that should be. How would you feel if some legislator or third party funding
source was the deciding factor That determined whether you fit criteria to be
able to receive services? What would you do if the agency that is funding your
services said we don't have the money to help you so you are just going to have
sit at home? A person that is disabled has to fight every day of their whole
life.
This subject is very
personal to me since I had a brother that had general cognitive Disabilities. My brother Kevin attended a center based employment, Day Service
program. For
my He
would not have been successful working out in the community unless he had one
on one
coaching. With all the funding cuts happening to social programs I don’t
foresee any program
Wanting
to fund one on one supports for all of someone’s
work history if they won’t do it now.
So
what would happen to my brother if he was not able to continue working at a employment
based center and it was closed because some obscure voice that was telling him
that he was being exploited and segregated, would he understand what
that meant, why he couldn’t go to somewhere that he loved to go every day. Whenever he would come home he would talk off and on through out
the whole visit, with pride, what he had been doing at the center since I had
seen him the last time, he took great pleasure in sharing with his friends and
families of his accomplishments. Now hearing I want you to
ask yourself when you have pride in your accomplishments and goals do you share
them with those around you? Now ask yourself, how
you would feel if that was all taken away from you. There is also talk about closing group homes under this
proposal? How would this affect my family and would I be able to
adequately provide for him. I debated many times
over the years on whether or not I should bring my older brother home to live
with me. He started out in an institution and then went to a group home,
by the time I was established enough to be able to take care of him he had been
living with the same group of men for twelve years. The bottom line was he loved the people that he lived with and
he loved his staff. I felt that he lived in
an amazing group home where people were able to see to his medical needs
twenty-four hours a day. Now ask yourself how would you feel if all of that was
taken away from you? There is an old adage, “You never really
understand a person until you consider things from his point of view... Until
you climb into his skin and walk around in it." spoken by Atticus Finch,
written by Harper Lee, To Kill a Mockingbird”
In this area there are a few different ways that you can access
to help you to attain services that are going to help support your daily living
needs. The three choices that
you can choose from are, "Western Wisconsin Cares, IRIS(I Self-Direct Services) and Care
Wisconsin.
The
way that Western Wisconsin Cares operates is that each person has a social
worker, and a nurse.
The care team for this
program works together to asses a person's needs and preferences, define desired outcomes and develop an
individualized care plan. This type of program controls
the
client’s money and is the one that decides what kind of services that
will be paid for and allowed. IRIS is a program where you self-direct your publicly funded,
community-based, long-term care supports and services. IRIS can help you get
the life you want with the support you need. In IRIS you use your own natural
supports and creativity with your budget to achieve your hopes and dreams. Care Wisconsin is very
similar to Western Wisconsin care, where there is a care management team that
helps coordinate your
programs. Each
family has to make the decision on what would work best for their family
member. Sometimes it is very
hard to know, what would be the best choice.
Right
now there are so many cuts to social service programs. There is a debate on
sheltered
workshops and what kinds of services that the government thinks that a disabled person should receive. Current proposed regulations could eliminate center-based
employment, like the Riverfront production facilities. (This may also affect
those living in an adult family home.)
CMS
has already acted on this in other states by directing the closing of
center-based Employment facilities. At Riverfront, we have
seen participants denied center-based
Employment
when they do not have a community employment goal. It’s possible that these
Regulations
could close production facilities and adult family homes like those operated by
Riverfront. One
of the biggest debates is that some people in the government think that
sheltered
Workshops
are holding back or segregating a person with disabilities. The law is very vague and
Very
open to interpretation.
The
National Disability Rights Network believes that sheltered workshops exploit a
Disabled
person. They believe that they
do not provide meaningful employment opportunities.
They
think that sheltered workshops exploit a person’s
disability for financial gain and keep
They
trapped in endless training programs. Organizations like this believe that all sheltered workshops
should be closed. They believe that persons with disabilities should all be
working in the community. Right now a person with disabilities is paid a prevailing wage
based on their rate of production. if a handicapped worker's productivity is reported to be 65% of
the normal productivity for a non handicapped worker doing essentially the same kind
of work, the handicapped individual's wage can legally be 65% of the prevailing
wage for that job.
This
bill would eliminate Section 14(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, which
allows center- based facilities like Riverfront’s to
pay participants based on their productivity as compared to the prevailing wage
rates for similar work in the community. Under the current rules,
participants are paid according to their skill and ability. At Riverfront
productivity rates average About 30%. Requiring that all
participants be paid the prevailing wage would eliminate employment
opportunities at production facilities for people who have few opportunities
for employment in the community, or those building skills for successful
community employment.
Riverfront
Incorporated that resides in La Crosse Wisconsin believes a one-size-fits-all
solution to services does not reflect the diversity of needs of people with
disabilities. A continuum of services is needed to support each individual’s
unique abilities, interests and priorities. This organization is like many and has a multitude of
opportunities. The programs that are offered, are Job placement, whether in the
community or at the sheltered workshop, Day service programs, behavioral
programs, prime
time programs for seniors,
mental health counseling,
recreation trips, and at home services. Everything that an Organization like this does, is so that a
person can be integrated into the community and be able to have a
wide variety of experiences and supports.
Riverfront CEO Mary
Kessons said in an article that the proposal from the centers of Medicare and
Medicaid would bar dollars from going to any such programs. It is already happening across the United States; in New York
the agency has ordered the state to close all “sheltered workshops”. Mary Kessens also says
in response to this it would eliminate production facilities and homes for
people with disabilities. She believes that the
federal insistence that all people with disabilities should have jobs in the
community instead of specialized facilities is short sighted.
Even now the effects of
this proposed legislation is starting to be felt here. For example there is a brother and sister, Keith and Brenda, the
sister has learning delays and mental health issues, the brother has general
cognitive disabilities. When Keith first started
coming to Riverfront he was possibly the shyest person that I have ever me, and
he would only talk to a few staff. When he was walking
doing the hall he would walk with his head down, and when someone would
be walking to close he would veer to the other side of the hall. Every year Riverfront has a banquet to honor the participants
and their achievements. That first year Keith
played the piano. The only way that he
could play was if there was a screen blocking anyone from looking at him, and
he wanted that way because he would just close down if he knew people were
looking at him. That event took place
four years ago, now Keith has a huge circle of friends and is able to talk to
more than just a few people. He loves to be in dance
class, and loves to work in the afternoon on the production floor. The jobs that Keith does is sorting and labeling. I talked to his job coach who had tears in her eyes as she spoke
so affectionately. She said, Keith is a
much happier and outgoing person from when he first started. She also said that his level of work has not progressed to the
level for him to be able to work in the community on his own. The job coach also shared with me that what she thinks is
important in this case is that Keith is happy and his family is happy with
where he is at right now. With the funding cuts it
was proposed that both Keith’s and Brenda’s service be cut, and that the sister could watch her brother
while the parents were at work. This to me sounds like
regression into segregation. What would Keith have
done if there weren’t places like Riverfront to go to after he finished school? I asked Keith’s job coach what she thought and she said she doesn’t
think he would be in the same place today emotionally if we wouldn’t
have had access to these kinds of support.
Another example is of
another brother and sister. They were coming to
Riverfront five full days a week, attending day services in the morning and
working on the production floor in the afternoon. Now they only come into
the Center three days and week and sit at home in isolation the other two days
of the week.
There
are several types of programs that can be very beneficial to someone that needs
assistance to meet personal goals. A day service
rehabilitation program helps a Disabled person identify their needs. Goals are
set and put in a plan so a person can eventually attain that goal. Examples of
goals could be to help with behavioral challenges such as aggression, helping
an autistic person connect with other people appropriately, to learn how to use
a walker, how to count money, how to read recipes, cook, and how to work in
different environments. Other very important factors could be supporting the
family, giving them respite, teaching skills, helping with mobility,
communication, coping skills, socialization, self-care, community integration
through outings. A person that is support through these kind of programs are
less depressed, have more confidence, and live meaningful lives. They learn
that they have gifts and can make a difference in other people’s
lives. If a person does not
have any support they might become isolated, and be at risk for being abused.
They might be placed in other services like institutions that are not
appropriate for their needs. A person not receiving supports might also be
denied the good things in life that could and should be available to them just
as they are to most people in a community. Another problem would be not being
able to develop skills or lose skills due to lack of support. If there were no
rehabilitation or day service centers for persons with disabilities they would
have to rely on their support networks that may or may not be healthy, their
own coping mechanisms that they might or might not have learned, and rely on
other people in the community to help them. Rehabilitation and Day Service
programs are needed, they are a right and should not to be seen as a privilege.
Every person deserves respect and support. Every person should be able to
choose their programs that are going to enhance their lives. Plain and simple
people with disabilities deserve to participate in life.
I had a lot of problems with formatting.
ReplyDeleteI lie your topic of choice, as it hits home with me, and family memebers I have, and also would effect my job. It was hard for me to read because of the issues with blogger setting up. I think I got your thesis, as being a need for goverment funding for these programmes.
ReplyDeleteIs the thesis to do with government funding for programs? yes formating was difficult, make sure to read over it not just spell check , couple of different places that the words were wrong.
ReplyDeleteThesis statement is clear. I can see how some professionals could get in a habit of disabling a special needs person too much. Hard to read due to format but im sure you know that. Thesis statement was also clear in the closing paragraph. Good job!
ReplyDeleteYour thesis statement is clear. you are very good at voicing your opinion in your papers and i really like that about this one. you make it clear what side you are on. Very good job!
ReplyDeletesecond paragraph at the end should be "so you are just going to have TO sit at home". Other than that small part, your argument is very good. I like how you use personal experience and state things that have happened to you or your siblings/family.
ReplyDeleteYour thesis statement was clear. I am pretty familiar with your topic because like I told you before my wife is a social worker. The formatting was a little distracting but that is not you fault it just uploaded funny. I did not really see any spelling errors. There were a couple spots where I think you used an incorrect word but after a couple proof reads you will sort that out. Good job.
ReplyDeleteThe formatting was hard to read. Overall lots of good points and research. You should email this essay to those stupid lawmakers trying to take away programs. I had trouble picking out the exact thesis statement even though I knew what you were talking about after reading a bit. Great Job!
ReplyDeleteYour topic touched my heart. Your thesis is clear. Once you get the blogger formatting to comply you should be good to go. Be aware of what the software did to your wok in it's messed up translation before you print out your final paper. Good job and good luck on the rest.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteOk, your readers are asking for a clear point at the beginning. Rhetorical questions are very effective. You string quite a few of them together. Perhaps change some of them to statements to help paint a picture of a disabled person's life. You do this through your brother Kevin, but perhaps nail that thesis right away in the intro. It's there--they need a voice--but I think your readers are perplexed at first. The other thing I would suggest is getting your directly quoted research in there to gain more credibility. You have it, surely, but you need more voices on your side--ultimately on the side of the disabled community.
ReplyDelete